-
CVE-2026-65310
•
published on July 31, 2026
ANDRITZ HIPASE-250 (formerly 250 SCALA), in the default configuration
of affected versions, exposes its data and configuration endpoint
without any authentication and permissive CORS on every response. An
unauthenticated attacker with network access can read live process
values and server configuration.
-
CVE-2026-65309
•
published on July 31, 2026
ANDRITZ HIPASE-250 (formerly 250 SCALA) in affected versions stores
and transmits user passwords using a reversible format instead of a
one-way password hash. This allows an attacker able to read the
credential store or capture network traffic to recover all stored
passwords.
-
CVE-2026-65309
•
published on July 31, 2026
ANDRITZ HIPASE-250 (formerly 250 SCALA) in affected versions stores
and transmits user passwords using a reversible format instead of a
one-way password hash. This allows an attacker able to read the
credential store or capture network traffic to recover all stored
passwords.
-
CVE-2026-65309
•
published on July 31, 2026
ANDRITZ HIPASE-250 (formerly 250 SCALA) in affected versions stores
and transmits user passwords using a reversible format instead of a
one-way password hash. This allows an attacker able to read the
credential store or capture network traffic to recover all stored
passwords.
-
CVE-2026-65309
•
published on July 31, 2026
ANDRITZ HIPASE-250 (formerly 250 SCALA) in affected versions stores
and transmits user passwords using a reversible format instead of a
one-way password hash. This allows an attacker able to read the
credential store or capture network traffic to recover all stored
passwords.
-
CVE-2026-65309
•
published on July 31, 2026
ANDRITZ HIPASE-250 (formerly 250 SCALA) in affected versions stores
and transmits user passwords using a reversible format instead of a
one-way password hash. This allows an attacker able to read the
credential store or capture network traffic to recover all stored
passwords.
-
CVE-2026-65309
•
published on July 31, 2026
ANDRITZ HIPASE-250 (formerly 250 SCALA) in affected versions stores
and transmits user passwords using a reversible format instead of a
one-way password hash. This allows an attacker able to read the
credential store or capture network traffic to recover all stored
passwords.
-
CVE-2026-65309
•
published on July 31, 2026
ANDRITZ HIPASE-250 (formerly 250 SCALA) in affected versions stores
and transmits user passwords using a reversible format instead of a
one-way password hash. This allows an attacker able to read the
credential store or capture network traffic to recover all stored
passwords.
-
CVE-2026-18209
•
published on July 31, 2026
A flaw was found in the keycloak-services component of Keycloak, which handles OpenID Connect (OIDC) authentication flows. The issue occurs because the security check designed to prevent HTTP parameter pollution only inspects the query portion of a redirect URL and ignores the fragment portion. When a client is configured with a wildcard redirect URI, an attacker can use this to inject duplicate security parameters into the login response. If a client application is not configured correctly, it might trust the attacker's injected data instead of the real security information from Keycloak, leading to session fixation or account confusion.
-
CVE-2026-18209
•
published on July 31, 2026
A flaw was found in the keycloak-services component of Keycloak, which handles OpenID Connect (OIDC) authentication flows. The issue occurs because the security check designed to prevent HTTP parameter pollution only inspects the query portion of a redirect URL and ignores the fragment portion. When a client is configured with a wildcard redirect URI, an attacker can use this to inject duplicate security parameters into the login response. If a client application is not configured correctly, it might trust the attacker's injected data instead of the real security information from Keycloak, leading to session fixation or account confusion.
-
CVE-2026-18209
•
published on July 31, 2026
A flaw was found in the keycloak-services component of Keycloak, which handles OpenID Connect (OIDC) authentication flows. The issue occurs because the security check designed to prevent HTTP parameter pollution only inspects the query portion of a redirect URL and ignores the fragment portion. When a client is configured with a wildcard redirect URI, an attacker can use this to inject duplicate security parameters into the login response. If a client application is not configured correctly, it might trust the attacker's injected data instead of the real security information from Keycloak, leading to session fixation or account confusion.
-
CVE-2026-18209
•
published on July 31, 2026
A flaw was found in the keycloak-services component of Keycloak, which handles OpenID Connect (OIDC) authentication flows. The issue occurs because the security check designed to prevent HTTP parameter pollution only inspects the query portion of a redirect URL and ignores the fragment portion. When a client is configured with a wildcard redirect URI, an attacker can use this to inject duplicate security parameters into the login response. If a client application is not configured correctly, it might trust the attacker's injected data instead of the real security information from Keycloak, leading to session fixation or account confusion.
-
CVE-2026-18209
•
published on July 31, 2026
A flaw was found in the keycloak-services component of Keycloak, which handles OpenID Connect (OIDC) authentication flows. The issue occurs because the security check designed to prevent HTTP parameter pollution only inspects the query portion of a redirect URL and ignores the fragment portion. When a client is configured with a wildcard redirect URI, an attacker can use this to inject duplicate security parameters into the login response. If a client application is not configured correctly, it might trust the attacker's injected data instead of the real security information from Keycloak, leading to session fixation or account confusion.
-
CVE-2026-18209
•
published on July 31, 2026
A flaw was found in the keycloak-services component of Keycloak, which handles OpenID Connect (OIDC) authentication flows. The issue occurs because the security check designed to prevent HTTP parameter pollution only inspects the query portion of a redirect URL and ignores the fragment portion. When a client is configured with a wildcard redirect URI, an attacker can use this to inject duplicate security parameters into the login response. If a client application is not configured correctly, it might trust the attacker's injected data instead of the real security information from Keycloak, leading to session fixation or account confusion.
-
CVE-2026-18209
•
published on July 31, 2026
A flaw was found in the keycloak-services component of Keycloak, which handles OpenID Connect (OIDC) authentication flows. The issue occurs because the security check designed to prevent HTTP parameter pollution only inspects the query portion of a redirect URL and ignores the fragment portion. When a client is configured with a wildcard redirect URI, an attacker can use this to inject duplicate security parameters into the login response. If a client application is not configured correctly, it might trust the attacker's injected data instead of the real security information from Keycloak, leading to session fixation or account confusion.
-
CVE-2026-18206
•
published on July 31, 2026
A flaw was found in the keycloak-services component of Keycloak, which provides identity and access management services. The issue occurs when a realm administrator uses a wildcard domain (like *.example.com) to restrict which hosts can register or update clients. Due to improper validation, the system accepts any hostname that ends with the specified domain suffix, even if it is not a legitimate subdomain. An attacker who can control the reverse DNS of their connection can bypass these host-based restrictions, potentially allowing unauthorized client modifications.
-
CVE-2026-18206
•
published on July 31, 2026
A flaw was found in the keycloak-services component of Keycloak, which provides identity and access management services. The issue occurs when a realm administrator uses a wildcard domain (like *.example.com) to restrict which hosts can register or update clients. Due to improper validation, the system accepts any hostname that ends with the specified domain suffix, even if it is not a legitimate subdomain. An attacker who can control the reverse DNS of their connection can bypass these host-based restrictions, potentially allowing unauthorized client modifications.
-
CVE-2026-18206
•
published on July 31, 2026
A flaw was found in the keycloak-services component of Keycloak, which provides identity and access management services. The issue occurs when a realm administrator uses a wildcard domain (like *.example.com) to restrict which hosts can register or update clients. Due to improper validation, the system accepts any hostname that ends with the specified domain suffix, even if it is not a legitimate subdomain. An attacker who can control the reverse DNS of their connection can bypass these host-based restrictions, potentially allowing unauthorized client modifications.
-
CVE-2026-18206
•
published on July 31, 2026
A flaw was found in the keycloak-services component of Keycloak, which provides identity and access management services. The issue occurs when a realm administrator uses a wildcard domain (like *.example.com) to restrict which hosts can register or update clients. Due to improper validation, the system accepts any hostname that ends with the specified domain suffix, even if it is not a legitimate subdomain. An attacker who can control the reverse DNS of their connection can bypass these host-based restrictions, potentially allowing unauthorized client modifications.
-
CVE-2026-18206
•
published on July 31, 2026
A flaw was found in the keycloak-services component of Keycloak, which provides identity and access management services. The issue occurs when a realm administrator uses a wildcard domain (like *.example.com) to restrict which hosts can register or update clients. Due to improper validation, the system accepts any hostname that ends with the specified domain suffix, even if it is not a legitimate subdomain. An attacker who can control the reverse DNS of their connection can bypass these host-based restrictions, potentially allowing unauthorized client modifications.
