-
CVE-2021-44502
•
published on April 15, 2022
An issue was discovered in FIS GT.M through V7.0-000 (related to the YottaDB code base). Using crafted input, an attacker can control the size of a memset that occurs in calls to util_format in sr_unix/util_output.c.
-
CVE-2021-44502
•
published on April 15, 2022
An issue was discovered in FIS GT.M through V7.0-000 (related to the YottaDB code base). Using crafted input, an attacker can control the size of a memset that occurs in calls to util_format in sr_unix/util_output.c.
-
CVE-2021-44501
•
published on April 15, 2022
An issue was discovered in FIS GT.M through V7.0-000 (related to the YottaDB code base). Using crafted input, an attacker can cause calls to ZRead to crash due to a NULL pointer dereference.
-
CVE-2021-44501
•
published on April 15, 2022
An issue was discovered in FIS GT.M through V7.0-000 (related to the YottaDB code base). Using crafted input, an attacker can cause calls to ZRead to crash due to a NULL pointer dereference.
-
CVE-2021-44501
•
published on April 15, 2022
An issue was discovered in FIS GT.M through V7.0-000 (related to the YottaDB code base). Using crafted input, an attacker can cause calls to ZRead to crash due to a NULL pointer dereference.
-
CVE-2021-44501
•
published on April 15, 2022
An issue was discovered in FIS GT.M through V7.0-000 (related to the YottaDB code base). Using crafted input, an attacker can cause calls to ZRead to crash due to a NULL pointer dereference.
-
CVE-2021-44500
•
published on April 15, 2022
An issue was discovered in FIS GT.M through V7.0-000 (related to the YottaDB code base). A lack of input validation in calls to eb_div in sr_port/eb_muldiv.c allows attackers to crash the application by performing a divide by zero.
-
CVE-2021-44500
•
published on April 15, 2022
An issue was discovered in FIS GT.M through V7.0-000 (related to the YottaDB code base). A lack of input validation in calls to eb_div in sr_port/eb_muldiv.c allows attackers to crash the application by performing a divide by zero.
-
CVE-2021-44500
•
published on April 15, 2022
An issue was discovered in FIS GT.M through V7.0-000 (related to the YottaDB code base). A lack of input validation in calls to eb_div in sr_port/eb_muldiv.c allows attackers to crash the application by performing a divide by zero.
-
CVE-2021-44500
•
published on April 15, 2022
An issue was discovered in FIS GT.M through V7.0-000 (related to the YottaDB code base). A lack of input validation in calls to eb_div in sr_port/eb_muldiv.c allows attackers to crash the application by performing a divide by zero.
-
CVE-2021-44499
•
published on April 15, 2022
An issue was discovered in FIS GT.M through V7.0-000 (related to the YottaDB code base). Using crafted input, an attacker can cause a call to $Extract to force an signed integer holding the size of a buffer to take on a large negative number, which is then used as the length of a memcpy call that occurs on the stack, causing a buffer overflow.
-
CVE-2021-44499
•
published on April 15, 2022
An issue was discovered in FIS GT.M through V7.0-000 (related to the YottaDB code base). Using crafted input, an attacker can cause a call to $Extract to force an signed integer holding the size of a buffer to take on a large negative number, which is then used as the length of a memcpy call that occurs on the stack, causing a buffer overflow.
-
CVE-2021-44499
•
published on April 15, 2022
An issue was discovered in FIS GT.M through V7.0-000 (related to the YottaDB code base). Using crafted input, an attacker can cause a call to $Extract to force an signed integer holding the size of a buffer to take on a large negative number, which is then used as the length of a memcpy call that occurs on the stack, causing a buffer overflow.
-
CVE-2021-44499
•
published on April 15, 2022
An issue was discovered in FIS GT.M through V7.0-000 (related to the YottaDB code base). Using crafted input, an attacker can cause a call to $Extract to force an signed integer holding the size of a buffer to take on a large negative number, which is then used as the length of a memcpy call that occurs on the stack, causing a buffer overflow.
-
CVE-2021-44498
•
published on April 15, 2022
An issue was discovered in FIS GT.M through V7.0-000 (related to the YottaDB code base). Using crafted input, attackers can cause a type to be incorrectly initialized in the function f_incr in sr_port/f_incr.c and cause a crash due to a NULL pointer dereference.
-
CVE-2021-44498
•
published on April 15, 2022
An issue was discovered in FIS GT.M through V7.0-000 (related to the YottaDB code base). Using crafted input, attackers can cause a type to be incorrectly initialized in the function f_incr in sr_port/f_incr.c and cause a crash due to a NULL pointer dereference.
-
CVE-2021-44498
•
published on April 15, 2022
An issue was discovered in FIS GT.M through V7.0-000 (related to the YottaDB code base). Using crafted input, attackers can cause a type to be incorrectly initialized in the function f_incr in sr_port/f_incr.c and cause a crash due to a NULL pointer dereference.
-
CVE-2021-44498
•
published on April 15, 2022
An issue was discovered in FIS GT.M through V7.0-000 (related to the YottaDB code base). Using crafted input, attackers can cause a type to be incorrectly initialized in the function f_incr in sr_port/f_incr.c and cause a crash due to a NULL pointer dereference.
-
CVE-2021-44497
•
published on April 15, 2022
An issue was discovered in FIS GT.M through V7.0-000 (related to the YottaDB code base). Using crafted input, can cause the bounds of a for loop to be miscalculated, which leads to a use after free condition a pointer is pushed into previously free memory by the loop.
-
CVE-2021-44497
•
published on April 15, 2022
An issue was discovered in FIS GT.M through V7.0-000 (related to the YottaDB code base). Using crafted input, can cause the bounds of a for loop to be miscalculated, which leads to a use after free condition a pointer is pushed into previously free memory by the loop.
