-
CVE-2025-39788
•
published on September 11, 2025
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: ufs: exynos: Fix programming of HCI_UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE
On Google gs101, the number of UTP transfer request slots (nutrs) is 32,
and in this case the driver ends up programming the UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE
incorrectly as 0.
This is because the left hand side of the shift is 1, which is of type
int, i.e. 31 bits wide. Shifting by more than that width results in
undefined behaviour.
Fix this by switching to the BIT() macro, which applies correct type
casting as required. This ensures the correct value is written to
UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE (0xffffffff on gs101), and it also fixes a UBSAN shift
warning:
UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in drivers/ufs/host/ufs-exynos.c:1113:21
shift exponent 32 is too large for 32-bit type 'int'
For consistency, apply the same change to the nutmrs / UTMRL_NEXUS_TYPE
write.
-
CVE-2025-39788
•
published on September 11, 2025
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: ufs: exynos: Fix programming of HCI_UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE
On Google gs101, the number of UTP transfer request slots (nutrs) is 32,
and in this case the driver ends up programming the UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE
incorrectly as 0.
This is because the left hand side of the shift is 1, which is of type
int, i.e. 31 bits wide. Shifting by more than that width results in
undefined behaviour.
Fix this by switching to the BIT() macro, which applies correct type
casting as required. This ensures the correct value is written to
UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE (0xffffffff on gs101), and it also fixes a UBSAN shift
warning:
UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in drivers/ufs/host/ufs-exynos.c:1113:21
shift exponent 32 is too large for 32-bit type 'int'
For consistency, apply the same change to the nutmrs / UTMRL_NEXUS_TYPE
write.
-
CVE-2025-39788
•
published on September 11, 2025
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: ufs: exynos: Fix programming of HCI_UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE
On Google gs101, the number of UTP transfer request slots (nutrs) is 32,
and in this case the driver ends up programming the UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE
incorrectly as 0.
This is because the left hand side of the shift is 1, which is of type
int, i.e. 31 bits wide. Shifting by more than that width results in
undefined behaviour.
Fix this by switching to the BIT() macro, which applies correct type
casting as required. This ensures the correct value is written to
UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE (0xffffffff on gs101), and it also fixes a UBSAN shift
warning:
UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in drivers/ufs/host/ufs-exynos.c:1113:21
shift exponent 32 is too large for 32-bit type 'int'
For consistency, apply the same change to the nutmrs / UTMRL_NEXUS_TYPE
write.
-
CVE-2025-39788
•
published on September 11, 2025
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: ufs: exynos: Fix programming of HCI_UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE
On Google gs101, the number of UTP transfer request slots (nutrs) is 32,
and in this case the driver ends up programming the UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE
incorrectly as 0.
This is because the left hand side of the shift is 1, which is of type
int, i.e. 31 bits wide. Shifting by more than that width results in
undefined behaviour.
Fix this by switching to the BIT() macro, which applies correct type
casting as required. This ensures the correct value is written to
UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE (0xffffffff on gs101), and it also fixes a UBSAN shift
warning:
UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in drivers/ufs/host/ufs-exynos.c:1113:21
shift exponent 32 is too large for 32-bit type 'int'
For consistency, apply the same change to the nutmrs / UTMRL_NEXUS_TYPE
write.
-
CVE-2025-39788
•
published on September 11, 2025
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: ufs: exynos: Fix programming of HCI_UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE
On Google gs101, the number of UTP transfer request slots (nutrs) is 32,
and in this case the driver ends up programming the UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE
incorrectly as 0.
This is because the left hand side of the shift is 1, which is of type
int, i.e. 31 bits wide. Shifting by more than that width results in
undefined behaviour.
Fix this by switching to the BIT() macro, which applies correct type
casting as required. This ensures the correct value is written to
UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE (0xffffffff on gs101), and it also fixes a UBSAN shift
warning:
UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in drivers/ufs/host/ufs-exynos.c:1113:21
shift exponent 32 is too large for 32-bit type 'int'
For consistency, apply the same change to the nutmrs / UTMRL_NEXUS_TYPE
write.
-
CVE-2025-39788
•
published on September 11, 2025
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: ufs: exynos: Fix programming of HCI_UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE
On Google gs101, the number of UTP transfer request slots (nutrs) is 32,
and in this case the driver ends up programming the UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE
incorrectly as 0.
This is because the left hand side of the shift is 1, which is of type
int, i.e. 31 bits wide. Shifting by more than that width results in
undefined behaviour.
Fix this by switching to the BIT() macro, which applies correct type
casting as required. This ensures the correct value is written to
UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE (0xffffffff on gs101), and it also fixes a UBSAN shift
warning:
UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in drivers/ufs/host/ufs-exynos.c:1113:21
shift exponent 32 is too large for 32-bit type 'int'
For consistency, apply the same change to the nutmrs / UTMRL_NEXUS_TYPE
write.
-
CVE-2025-39788
•
published on September 11, 2025
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: ufs: exynos: Fix programming of HCI_UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE
On Google gs101, the number of UTP transfer request slots (nutrs) is 32,
and in this case the driver ends up programming the UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE
incorrectly as 0.
This is because the left hand side of the shift is 1, which is of type
int, i.e. 31 bits wide. Shifting by more than that width results in
undefined behaviour.
Fix this by switching to the BIT() macro, which applies correct type
casting as required. This ensures the correct value is written to
UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE (0xffffffff on gs101), and it also fixes a UBSAN shift
warning:
UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in drivers/ufs/host/ufs-exynos.c:1113:21
shift exponent 32 is too large for 32-bit type 'int'
For consistency, apply the same change to the nutmrs / UTMRL_NEXUS_TYPE
write.
-
CVE-2025-39788
•
published on September 11, 2025
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: ufs: exynos: Fix programming of HCI_UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE
On Google gs101, the number of UTP transfer request slots (nutrs) is 32,
and in this case the driver ends up programming the UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE
incorrectly as 0.
This is because the left hand side of the shift is 1, which is of type
int, i.e. 31 bits wide. Shifting by more than that width results in
undefined behaviour.
Fix this by switching to the BIT() macro, which applies correct type
casting as required. This ensures the correct value is written to
UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE (0xffffffff on gs101), and it also fixes a UBSAN shift
warning:
UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in drivers/ufs/host/ufs-exynos.c:1113:21
shift exponent 32 is too large for 32-bit type 'int'
For consistency, apply the same change to the nutmrs / UTMRL_NEXUS_TYPE
write.
-
CVE-2025-39788
•
published on September 11, 2025
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: ufs: exynos: Fix programming of HCI_UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE
On Google gs101, the number of UTP transfer request slots (nutrs) is 32,
and in this case the driver ends up programming the UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE
incorrectly as 0.
This is because the left hand side of the shift is 1, which is of type
int, i.e. 31 bits wide. Shifting by more than that width results in
undefined behaviour.
Fix this by switching to the BIT() macro, which applies correct type
casting as required. This ensures the correct value is written to
UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE (0xffffffff on gs101), and it also fixes a UBSAN shift
warning:
UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in drivers/ufs/host/ufs-exynos.c:1113:21
shift exponent 32 is too large for 32-bit type 'int'
For consistency, apply the same change to the nutmrs / UTMRL_NEXUS_TYPE
write.
-
CVE-2025-39787
•
published on September 11, 2025
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soc: qcom: mdt_loader: Ensure we don't read past the ELF header
When the MDT loader is used in remoteproc, the ELF header is sanitized
beforehand, but that's not necessary the case for other clients.
Validate the size of the firmware buffer to ensure that we don't read
past the end as we iterate over the header. e_phentsize and e_shentsize
are validated as well, to ensure that the assumptions about step size in
the traversal are valid.
-
CVE-2025-39787
•
published on September 11, 2025
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soc: qcom: mdt_loader: Ensure we don't read past the ELF header
When the MDT loader is used in remoteproc, the ELF header is sanitized
beforehand, but that's not necessary the case for other clients.
Validate the size of the firmware buffer to ensure that we don't read
past the end as we iterate over the header. e_phentsize and e_shentsize
are validated as well, to ensure that the assumptions about step size in
the traversal are valid.
-
CVE-2025-39787
•
published on September 11, 2025
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soc: qcom: mdt_loader: Ensure we don't read past the ELF header
When the MDT loader is used in remoteproc, the ELF header is sanitized
beforehand, but that's not necessary the case for other clients.
Validate the size of the firmware buffer to ensure that we don't read
past the end as we iterate over the header. e_phentsize and e_shentsize
are validated as well, to ensure that the assumptions about step size in
the traversal are valid.
-
CVE-2025-39787
•
published on September 11, 2025
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soc: qcom: mdt_loader: Ensure we don't read past the ELF header
When the MDT loader is used in remoteproc, the ELF header is sanitized
beforehand, but that's not necessary the case for other clients.
Validate the size of the firmware buffer to ensure that we don't read
past the end as we iterate over the header. e_phentsize and e_shentsize
are validated as well, to ensure that the assumptions about step size in
the traversal are valid.
-
CVE-2025-39787
•
published on September 11, 2025
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soc: qcom: mdt_loader: Ensure we don't read past the ELF header
When the MDT loader is used in remoteproc, the ELF header is sanitized
beforehand, but that's not necessary the case for other clients.
Validate the size of the firmware buffer to ensure that we don't read
past the end as we iterate over the header. e_phentsize and e_shentsize
are validated as well, to ensure that the assumptions about step size in
the traversal are valid.
-
CVE-2025-39787
•
published on September 11, 2025
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soc: qcom: mdt_loader: Ensure we don't read past the ELF header
When the MDT loader is used in remoteproc, the ELF header is sanitized
beforehand, but that's not necessary the case for other clients.
Validate the size of the firmware buffer to ensure that we don't read
past the end as we iterate over the header. e_phentsize and e_shentsize
are validated as well, to ensure that the assumptions about step size in
the traversal are valid.
-
CVE-2025-39787
•
published on September 11, 2025
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soc: qcom: mdt_loader: Ensure we don't read past the ELF header
When the MDT loader is used in remoteproc, the ELF header is sanitized
beforehand, but that's not necessary the case for other clients.
Validate the size of the firmware buffer to ensure that we don't read
past the end as we iterate over the header. e_phentsize and e_shentsize
are validated as well, to ensure that the assumptions about step size in
the traversal are valid.
-
CVE-2025-39787
•
published on September 11, 2025
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soc: qcom: mdt_loader: Ensure we don't read past the ELF header
When the MDT loader is used in remoteproc, the ELF header is sanitized
beforehand, but that's not necessary the case for other clients.
Validate the size of the firmware buffer to ensure that we don't read
past the end as we iterate over the header. e_phentsize and e_shentsize
are validated as well, to ensure that the assumptions about step size in
the traversal are valid.
-
CVE-2025-39787
•
published on September 11, 2025
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soc: qcom: mdt_loader: Ensure we don't read past the ELF header
When the MDT loader is used in remoteproc, the ELF header is sanitized
beforehand, but that's not necessary the case for other clients.
Validate the size of the firmware buffer to ensure that we don't read
past the end as we iterate over the header. e_phentsize and e_shentsize
are validated as well, to ensure that the assumptions about step size in
the traversal are valid.
-
CVE-2025-39787
•
published on September 11, 2025
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soc: qcom: mdt_loader: Ensure we don't read past the ELF header
When the MDT loader is used in remoteproc, the ELF header is sanitized
beforehand, but that's not necessary the case for other clients.
Validate the size of the firmware buffer to ensure that we don't read
past the end as we iterate over the header. e_phentsize and e_shentsize
are validated as well, to ensure that the assumptions about step size in
the traversal are valid.
-
CVE-2025-39787
•
published on September 11, 2025
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soc: qcom: mdt_loader: Ensure we don't read past the ELF header
When the MDT loader is used in remoteproc, the ELF header is sanitized
beforehand, but that's not necessary the case for other clients.
Validate the size of the firmware buffer to ensure that we don't read
past the end as we iterate over the header. e_phentsize and e_shentsize
are validated as well, to ensure that the assumptions about step size in
the traversal are valid.
