Full List

Search

Recent Vulnerabilities

• CVE-2026-67355 • published on August 1, 2026 guzzlehttp/guzzle versions before 7.15.1 fail to preserve host-only cookie scope, storing the request host in the Domain field instead of marking cookies as host-only. Attackers controlling child hosts can receive host-only cookies intended only for parent hosts, potentially disclosing session identifiers and authorization tokens when the same cookie jar is reused across trust boundaries.
• CVE-2026-67355 • published on August 1, 2026 guzzlehttp/guzzle versions before 7.15.1 fail to preserve host-only cookie scope, storing the request host in the Domain field instead of marking cookies as host-only. Attackers controlling child hosts can receive host-only cookies intended only for parent hosts, potentially disclosing session identifiers and authorization tokens when the same cookie jar is reused across trust boundaries.
• CVE-2026-67355 • published on August 1, 2026 guzzlehttp/guzzle versions before 7.15.1 fail to preserve host-only cookie scope, storing the request host in the Domain field instead of marking cookies as host-only. Attackers controlling child hosts can receive host-only cookies intended only for parent hosts, potentially disclosing session identifiers and authorization tokens when the same cookie jar is reused across trust boundaries.
• CVE-2026-67355 • published on August 1, 2026 guzzlehttp/guzzle versions before 7.15.1 fail to preserve host-only cookie scope, storing the request host in the Domain field instead of marking cookies as host-only. Attackers controlling child hosts can receive host-only cookies intended only for parent hosts, potentially disclosing session identifiers and authorization tokens when the same cookie jar is reused across trust boundaries.
• CVE-2026-67331 • published on August 1, 2026 better-auth SCIM versions from 1.5.0 before 1.7.0-beta.4 fail to bind non-organization SCIM providers to their creator by default, allowing authenticated users to manage other users' providers. Attackers can regenerate SCIM bearer tokens, invalidate legitimate tokens, and authenticate to SCIM API routes with the attacker-controlled token.
• CVE-2026-67331 • published on August 1, 2026 better-auth SCIM versions from 1.5.0 before 1.7.0-beta.4 fail to bind non-organization SCIM providers to their creator by default, allowing authenticated users to manage other users' providers. Attackers can regenerate SCIM bearer tokens, invalidate legitimate tokens, and authenticate to SCIM API routes with the attacker-controlled token.
• CVE-2026-67331 • published on August 1, 2026 better-auth SCIM versions from 1.5.0 before 1.7.0-beta.4 fail to bind non-organization SCIM providers to their creator by default, allowing authenticated users to manage other users' providers. Attackers can regenerate SCIM bearer tokens, invalidate legitimate tokens, and authenticate to SCIM API routes with the attacker-controlled token.
• CVE-2026-67331 • published on August 1, 2026 better-auth SCIM versions from 1.5.0 before 1.7.0-beta.4 fail to bind non-organization SCIM providers to their creator by default, allowing authenticated users to manage other users' providers. Attackers can regenerate SCIM bearer tokens, invalidate legitimate tokens, and authenticate to SCIM API routes with the attacker-controlled token.
• CVE-2026-67331 • published on August 1, 2026 better-auth SCIM versions from 1.5.0 before 1.7.0-beta.4 fail to bind non-organization SCIM providers to their creator by default, allowing authenticated users to manage other users' providers. Attackers can regenerate SCIM bearer tokens, invalidate legitimate tokens, and authenticate to SCIM API routes with the attacker-controlled token.
• CVE-2026-67320 • published on August 1, 2026 axios in a Node.js deployment using the HTTP adapter can route requests through an attacker-controlled proxy. axios hardens merged request configuration by creating a null-prototype object, but request interceptors run after the merge; a common immutable interceptor pattern such as {...config} or Object.assign({}, config) converts the hardened config back into a regular object. axios then dispatches that object without re-hardening it, and the Node HTTP adapter reads config.proxy through the prototype chain. If an attacker can pollute Object.prototype.proxy, affected requests can be routed through an attacker-controlled proxy. For plaintext HTTP requests, the proxy can observe Authorization headers, Basic auth from config.auth, method, absolute URL, Host, and request body, and can return its own response. This does not establish browser impact or HTTPS header/body disclosure under normal TLS validation. Affected versions are =0.31.1 (fixed in 0.33.0) and >=1.15.2 (fixed in 1.18.0).
• CVE-2026-67320 • published on August 1, 2026 axios in a Node.js deployment using the HTTP adapter can route requests through an attacker-controlled proxy. axios hardens merged request configuration by creating a null-prototype object, but request interceptors run after the merge; a common immutable interceptor pattern such as {...config} or Object.assign({}, config) converts the hardened config back into a regular object. axios then dispatches that object without re-hardening it, and the Node HTTP adapter reads config.proxy through the prototype chain. If an attacker can pollute Object.prototype.proxy, affected requests can be routed through an attacker-controlled proxy. For plaintext HTTP requests, the proxy can observe Authorization headers, Basic auth from config.auth, method, absolute URL, Host, and request body, and can return its own response. This does not establish browser impact or HTTPS header/body disclosure under normal TLS validation. Affected versions are =0.31.1 (fixed in 0.33.0) and >=1.15.2 (fixed in 1.18.0).
• CVE-2026-67320 • published on August 1, 2026 axios in a Node.js deployment using the HTTP adapter can route requests through an attacker-controlled proxy. axios hardens merged request configuration by creating a null-prototype object, but request interceptors run after the merge; a common immutable interceptor pattern such as {...config} or Object.assign({}, config) converts the hardened config back into a regular object. axios then dispatches that object without re-hardening it, and the Node HTTP adapter reads config.proxy through the prototype chain. If an attacker can pollute Object.prototype.proxy, affected requests can be routed through an attacker-controlled proxy. For plaintext HTTP requests, the proxy can observe Authorization headers, Basic auth from config.auth, method, absolute URL, Host, and request body, and can return its own response. This does not establish browser impact or HTTPS header/body disclosure under normal TLS validation. Affected versions are =0.31.1 (fixed in 0.33.0) and >=1.15.2 (fixed in 1.18.0).
• CVE-2026-67320 • published on August 1, 2026 axios in a Node.js deployment using the HTTP adapter can route requests through an attacker-controlled proxy. axios hardens merged request configuration by creating a null-prototype object, but request interceptors run after the merge; a common immutable interceptor pattern such as {...config} or Object.assign({}, config) converts the hardened config back into a regular object. axios then dispatches that object without re-hardening it, and the Node HTTP adapter reads config.proxy through the prototype chain. If an attacker can pollute Object.prototype.proxy, affected requests can be routed through an attacker-controlled proxy. For plaintext HTTP requests, the proxy can observe Authorization headers, Basic auth from config.auth, method, absolute URL, Host, and request body, and can return its own response. This does not establish browser impact or HTTPS header/body disclosure under normal TLS validation. Affected versions are =0.31.1 (fixed in 0.33.0) and >=1.15.2 (fixed in 1.18.0).
• CVE-2026-67320 • published on August 1, 2026 axios in a Node.js deployment using the HTTP adapter can route requests through an attacker-controlled proxy. axios hardens merged request configuration by creating a null-prototype object, but request interceptors run after the merge; a common immutable interceptor pattern such as {...config} or Object.assign({}, config) converts the hardened config back into a regular object. axios then dispatches that object without re-hardening it, and the Node HTTP adapter reads config.proxy through the prototype chain. If an attacker can pollute Object.prototype.proxy, affected requests can be routed through an attacker-controlled proxy. For plaintext HTTP requests, the proxy can observe Authorization headers, Basic auth from config.auth, method, absolute URL, Host, and request body, and can return its own response. This does not establish browser impact or HTTPS header/body disclosure under normal TLS validation. Affected versions are =0.31.1 (fixed in 0.33.0) and >=1.15.2 (fixed in 1.18.0).
• CVE-2026-67304 • published on August 1, 2026 FreeRDP before 3.29.0 contains a null pointer dereference vulnerability in smartcard device control request cleanup when reader-state decoding fails. Attackers can send malformed smartcard IRP requests with non-zero cReaders and truncated reader-state data to crash the process via null pointer access in free_reader_states functions.
• CVE-2026-67304 • published on August 1, 2026 FreeRDP before 3.29.0 contains a null pointer dereference vulnerability in smartcard device control request cleanup when reader-state decoding fails. Attackers can send malformed smartcard IRP requests with non-zero cReaders and truncated reader-state data to crash the process via null pointer access in free_reader_states functions.
• CVE-2026-67304 • published on August 1, 2026 FreeRDP before 3.29.0 contains a null pointer dereference vulnerability in smartcard device control request cleanup when reader-state decoding fails. Attackers can send malformed smartcard IRP requests with non-zero cReaders and truncated reader-state data to crash the process via null pointer access in free_reader_states functions.
• CVE-2026-67304 • published on August 1, 2026 FreeRDP before 3.29.0 contains a null pointer dereference vulnerability in smartcard device control request cleanup when reader-state decoding fails. Attackers can send malformed smartcard IRP requests with non-zero cReaders and truncated reader-state data to crash the process via null pointer access in free_reader_states functions.
• CVE-2026-67304 • published on August 1, 2026 FreeRDP before 3.29.0 contains a null pointer dereference vulnerability in smartcard device control request cleanup when reader-state decoding fails. Attackers can send malformed smartcard IRP requests with non-zero cReaders and truncated reader-state data to crash the process via null pointer access in free_reader_states functions.
• CVE-2026-67338 • published on August 1, 2026 JupyterLab before 4.5.9 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the Extension Manager that fails to validate URI protocols in package metadata URLs. Attackers can publish malicious PyPI packages with javascript: URLs in project metadata that execute arbitrary JavaScript in the JupyterLab origin when users click the extension name.