-
CVE-2025-22009
•
published on April 8, 2025
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
regulator: dummy: force synchronous probing
Sometimes I get a NULL pointer dereference at boot time in kobject_get()
with the following call stack:
anatop_regulator_probe()
devm_regulator_register()
regulator_register()
regulator_resolve_supply()
kobject_get()
By placing some extra BUG_ON() statements I could verify that this is
raised because probing of the 'dummy' regulator driver is not completed
('dummy_regulator_rdev' is still NULL).
In the JTAG debugger I can see that dummy_regulator_probe() and
anatop_regulator_probe() can be run by different kernel threads
(kworker/u4:*). I haven't further investigated whether this can be
changed or if there are other possibilities to force synchronization
between these two probe routines. On the other hand I don't expect much
boot time penalty by probing the 'dummy' regulator synchronously.
-
CVE-2025-22008
•
published on April 8, 2025
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
regulator: check that dummy regulator has been probed before using it
Due to asynchronous driver probing there is a chance that the dummy
regulator hasn't already been probed when first accessing it.
-
CVE-2025-2882
•
published on April 8, 2025
The GreenPay(tm) by Green.Money plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in versions between 3.0.0 and 3.0.9 through the publicly accessible phpinfo.php script. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to view potentially sensitive information contained in the exposed file.
-
CVE-2025-3431
•
published on April 8, 2025
The ZoomSounds - WordPress Wave Audio Player with Playlist plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Arbitrary File Read in all versions up to, and including, 6.91 via the 'dzsap_download' action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to read the contents of arbitrary files on the server, which can contain sensitive information.
-
CVE-2025-31333
•
published on April 8, 2025
SAP S4CORE OData meta-data property is vulnerable to data tampering, due to which entity set could be externally modified by an attacker causing low impact on integrity of the application. Confidentiality and availability is not impacted.
-
CVE-2025-31332
•
published on April 8, 2025
Due to insecure file permissions in SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform, an attacker who has local access to the system could modify files potentially disrupting operations or cause service downtime hence leading to a high impact on integrity and availability. However, this vulnerability does not disclose any sensitive data.
-
CVE-2025-31331
•
published on April 8, 2025
SAP NetWeaver allows an attacker to bypass authorization checks, enabling them to view portions of ABAP code that would normally require additional validation. Once logged into the ABAP system, the attacker can run a specific transaction that exposes sensitive system code without proper authorization. This vulnerability compromises the confidentiality.
-
CVE-2025-31330
•
published on April 8, 2025
SAP Landscape Transformation (SLT) allows an attacker with user privileges to exploit a vulnerability in the function module exposed via RFC. This flaw enables the injection of arbitrary ABAP code into the system, bypassing essential authorization checks. This vulnerability effectively functions as a backdoor, creating the risk of full system compromise, undermining the confidentiality, integrity and availability of the system.
-
CVE-2025-30017
•
published on April 8, 2025
Due to a missing authorization check, an authenticated attacker could upload a file as a template for solution documentation in SAP Solution Manager 7.1. After successful exploitation, an attacker can cause limited impact on the integrity and availability of the application.
-
CVE-2025-30016
•
published on April 8, 2025
SAP Financial Consolidation allows an unauthenticated attacker to gain unauthorized access to the Admin account. The vulnerability arises due to improper authentication mechanisms, due to which there is high impact on the Confidentiality, Integrity & Availability of the application.
-
CVE-2025-30015
•
published on April 8, 2025
Due to incorrect memory address handling in ABAP SQL of SAP NetWeaver and ABAP Platform (Application Server ABAP), an authenticated attacker with high privileges could execute certain forms of SQL queries leading to manipulation of content in the output variable. This vulnerability has a low impact on the confidentiality, integrity and the availability of the application.
-
CVE-2025-30014
•
published on April 8, 2025
SAP Capital Yield Tax Management has directory traversal vulnerability due to insufficient path validation. This could allow an attacker with low privileges to read files from directory which they don?t have access to, hence causing a high impact on confidentiality. Integrity and Availability are not affected.
-
CVE-2025-30013
•
published on April 8, 2025
SAP ERP BW Business Content is vulnerable to OS Command Injection through certain function modules. These function modules, when executed with elevated privileges, improperly handle user input, allowing attacker to inject arbitrary OS commands. This vulnerability allows the execution of unintended commands on the underlying system, posing a significant security risk to the confidentiality, integrity and availability of the application.
-
CVE-2025-27437
•
published on April 8, 2025
A Missing Authorization Check vulnerability exists in the Virus Scanner Interface of SAP NetWeaver Application Server ABAP. Because of this, an attacker authenticated as a non-administrative user can initiate a transaction, allowing them to access but not modify non-sensitive data without further authorization and with no effect on availability.
-
CVE-2025-27435
•
published on April 8, 2025
Under specific conditions and prerequisites, an unauthenticated attacker could access customer coupon codes exposed in the URL parameters of the Coupon Campaign URL in SAP Commerce. This could allow the attacker to use the disclosed coupon code, hence posing a low impact on confidentiality and integrity of the application.
-
CVE-2025-27429
•
published on April 8, 2025
SAP S/4HANA allows an attacker with user privileges to exploit a vulnerability in the function module exposed via RFC. This flaw enables the injection of arbitrary ABAP code into the system, bypassing essential authorization checks. This vulnerability effectively functions as a backdoor, creating the risk of full system compromise, undermining the confidentiality, integrity and availability of the system.
-
CVE-2025-27428
•
published on April 8, 2025
Due to directory traversal vulnerability, an authorized attacker could gain access to some critical information by using RFC enabled function module. Upon successful exploitation, they could read files from any managed system connected to SAP Solution Manager, leading to high impact on confidentiality. There is no impact on integrity or availability.
-
CVE-2025-26657
•
published on April 8, 2025
SAP KMC WPC allows an unauthenticated attacker to remotely retrieve usernames by a simple parameter query which could expose sensitive information causing low impact on confidentiality of the application. This has no effect on integrity and availability.
-
CVE-2025-26654
•
published on April 8, 2025
SAP Commerce Cloud (Public Cloud) does not allow to disable unencrypted HTTP (port 80) entirely, but instead allows a redirect from port 80 to 443 (HTTPS). As a result, Commerce normally communicates securely over HTTPS. However, the confidentiality and integrity of data sent on the first request before the redirect may be impacted if the client is configured to use HTTP and sends confidential data on the first request before the redirect.
-
CVE-2025-26653
•
published on April 8, 2025
SAP NetWeaver Application Server ABAP does not sufficiently encode user-controlled inputs, leading to Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. This enables an attacker, without requiring any privileges, to inject malicious JavaScript into a website. When a user visits the compromised page, the injected script gets executed, potentially compromising the confidentiality and integrity within the scope of the victim?s browser. Availability is not impacted.