Full List

Search

Recent Vulnerabilities

• CVE-2026-43201 • published on May 6, 2026 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: APEI/GHES: ARM processor Error: don't go past allocated memory If the BIOS generates a very small ARM Processor Error, or an incomplete one, the current logic will fail to deferrence err-section_length and ctx_info->size Add checks to avoid that. With such changes, such GHESv2 records won't cause OOPSes like this: [ 1.492129] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000005 [#1] SMP [ 1.495449] Modules linked in: [ 1.495820] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 6.18.0-rc1-00017-gabadcc3553dd-dirty #18 PREEMPT [ 1.496125] Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 02/02/2022 [ 1.496433] Workqueue: kacpi_notify acpi_os_execute_deferred [ 1.496967] pstate: 814000c5 (Nzcv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 1.497199] pc : log_arm_hw_error+0x5c/0x200 [ 1.497380] lr : ghes_handle_arm_hw_error+0x94/0x220 0xffff8000811c5324 is in log_arm_hw_error (../drivers/ras/ras.c:75). 70 err_info = (struct cper_arm_err_info *)(err + 1); 71 ctx_info = (struct cper_arm_ctx_info *)(err_info + err->err_info_num); 72 ctx_err = (u8 *)ctx_info; 73 74 for (n = 0; n err->context_info_num; n++) { 75 sz = sizeof(struct cper_arm_ctx_info) + ctx_info->size; 76 ctx_info = (struct cper_arm_ctx_info *)((long)ctx_info + sz); 77 ctx_len += sz; 78 } 79 and similar ones while trying to access section_length on an error dump with too small size. [ rjw: Subject tweaks ]
• CVE-2026-43201 • published on May 6, 2026 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: APEI/GHES: ARM processor Error: don't go past allocated memory If the BIOS generates a very small ARM Processor Error, or an incomplete one, the current logic will fail to deferrence err-section_length and ctx_info->size Add checks to avoid that. With such changes, such GHESv2 records won't cause OOPSes like this: [ 1.492129] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000005 [#1] SMP [ 1.495449] Modules linked in: [ 1.495820] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 6.18.0-rc1-00017-gabadcc3553dd-dirty #18 PREEMPT [ 1.496125] Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 02/02/2022 [ 1.496433] Workqueue: kacpi_notify acpi_os_execute_deferred [ 1.496967] pstate: 814000c5 (Nzcv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 1.497199] pc : log_arm_hw_error+0x5c/0x200 [ 1.497380] lr : ghes_handle_arm_hw_error+0x94/0x220 0xffff8000811c5324 is in log_arm_hw_error (../drivers/ras/ras.c:75). 70 err_info = (struct cper_arm_err_info *)(err + 1); 71 ctx_info = (struct cper_arm_ctx_info *)(err_info + err->err_info_num); 72 ctx_err = (u8 *)ctx_info; 73 74 for (n = 0; n err->context_info_num; n++) { 75 sz = sizeof(struct cper_arm_ctx_info) + ctx_info->size; 76 ctx_info = (struct cper_arm_ctx_info *)((long)ctx_info + sz); 77 ctx_len += sz; 78 } 79 and similar ones while trying to access section_length on an error dump with too small size. [ rjw: Subject tweaks ]
• CVE-2026-43201 • published on May 6, 2026 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: APEI/GHES: ARM processor Error: don't go past allocated memory If the BIOS generates a very small ARM Processor Error, or an incomplete one, the current logic will fail to deferrence err-section_length and ctx_info->size Add checks to avoid that. With such changes, such GHESv2 records won't cause OOPSes like this: [ 1.492129] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000005 [#1] SMP [ 1.495449] Modules linked in: [ 1.495820] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 6.18.0-rc1-00017-gabadcc3553dd-dirty #18 PREEMPT [ 1.496125] Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 02/02/2022 [ 1.496433] Workqueue: kacpi_notify acpi_os_execute_deferred [ 1.496967] pstate: 814000c5 (Nzcv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 1.497199] pc : log_arm_hw_error+0x5c/0x200 [ 1.497380] lr : ghes_handle_arm_hw_error+0x94/0x220 0xffff8000811c5324 is in log_arm_hw_error (../drivers/ras/ras.c:75). 70 err_info = (struct cper_arm_err_info *)(err + 1); 71 ctx_info = (struct cper_arm_ctx_info *)(err_info + err->err_info_num); 72 ctx_err = (u8 *)ctx_info; 73 74 for (n = 0; n err->context_info_num; n++) { 75 sz = sizeof(struct cper_arm_ctx_info) + ctx_info->size; 76 ctx_info = (struct cper_arm_ctx_info *)((long)ctx_info + sz); 77 ctx_len += sz; 78 } 79 and similar ones while trying to access section_length on an error dump with too small size. [ rjw: Subject tweaks ]
• CVE-2026-43201 • published on May 6, 2026 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: APEI/GHES: ARM processor Error: don't go past allocated memory If the BIOS generates a very small ARM Processor Error, or an incomplete one, the current logic will fail to deferrence err-section_length and ctx_info->size Add checks to avoid that. With such changes, such GHESv2 records won't cause OOPSes like this: [ 1.492129] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000005 [#1] SMP [ 1.495449] Modules linked in: [ 1.495820] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 6.18.0-rc1-00017-gabadcc3553dd-dirty #18 PREEMPT [ 1.496125] Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 02/02/2022 [ 1.496433] Workqueue: kacpi_notify acpi_os_execute_deferred [ 1.496967] pstate: 814000c5 (Nzcv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 1.497199] pc : log_arm_hw_error+0x5c/0x200 [ 1.497380] lr : ghes_handle_arm_hw_error+0x94/0x220 0xffff8000811c5324 is in log_arm_hw_error (../drivers/ras/ras.c:75). 70 err_info = (struct cper_arm_err_info *)(err + 1); 71 ctx_info = (struct cper_arm_ctx_info *)(err_info + err->err_info_num); 72 ctx_err = (u8 *)ctx_info; 73 74 for (n = 0; n err->context_info_num; n++) { 75 sz = sizeof(struct cper_arm_ctx_info) + ctx_info->size; 76 ctx_info = (struct cper_arm_ctx_info *)((long)ctx_info + sz); 77 ctx_len += sz; 78 } 79 and similar ones while trying to access section_length on an error dump with too small size. [ rjw: Subject tweaks ]
• CVE-2026-43201 • published on May 6, 2026 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: APEI/GHES: ARM processor Error: don't go past allocated memory If the BIOS generates a very small ARM Processor Error, or an incomplete one, the current logic will fail to deferrence err-section_length and ctx_info->size Add checks to avoid that. With such changes, such GHESv2 records won't cause OOPSes like this: [ 1.492129] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000005 [#1] SMP [ 1.495449] Modules linked in: [ 1.495820] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 6.18.0-rc1-00017-gabadcc3553dd-dirty #18 PREEMPT [ 1.496125] Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 02/02/2022 [ 1.496433] Workqueue: kacpi_notify acpi_os_execute_deferred [ 1.496967] pstate: 814000c5 (Nzcv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 1.497199] pc : log_arm_hw_error+0x5c/0x200 [ 1.497380] lr : ghes_handle_arm_hw_error+0x94/0x220 0xffff8000811c5324 is in log_arm_hw_error (../drivers/ras/ras.c:75). 70 err_info = (struct cper_arm_err_info *)(err + 1); 71 ctx_info = (struct cper_arm_ctx_info *)(err_info + err->err_info_num); 72 ctx_err = (u8 *)ctx_info; 73 74 for (n = 0; n err->context_info_num; n++) { 75 sz = sizeof(struct cper_arm_ctx_info) + ctx_info->size; 76 ctx_info = (struct cper_arm_ctx_info *)((long)ctx_info + sz); 77 ctx_len += sz; 78 } 79 and similar ones while trying to access section_length on an error dump with too small size. [ rjw: Subject tweaks ]
• CVE-2026-43201 • published on May 6, 2026 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: APEI/GHES: ARM processor Error: don't go past allocated memory If the BIOS generates a very small ARM Processor Error, or an incomplete one, the current logic will fail to deferrence err-section_length and ctx_info->size Add checks to avoid that. With such changes, such GHESv2 records won't cause OOPSes like this: [ 1.492129] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000005 [#1] SMP [ 1.495449] Modules linked in: [ 1.495820] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 6.18.0-rc1-00017-gabadcc3553dd-dirty #18 PREEMPT [ 1.496125] Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 02/02/2022 [ 1.496433] Workqueue: kacpi_notify acpi_os_execute_deferred [ 1.496967] pstate: 814000c5 (Nzcv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 1.497199] pc : log_arm_hw_error+0x5c/0x200 [ 1.497380] lr : ghes_handle_arm_hw_error+0x94/0x220 0xffff8000811c5324 is in log_arm_hw_error (../drivers/ras/ras.c:75). 70 err_info = (struct cper_arm_err_info *)(err + 1); 71 ctx_info = (struct cper_arm_ctx_info *)(err_info + err->err_info_num); 72 ctx_err = (u8 *)ctx_info; 73 74 for (n = 0; n err->context_info_num; n++) { 75 sz = sizeof(struct cper_arm_ctx_info) + ctx_info->size; 76 ctx_info = (struct cper_arm_ctx_info *)((long)ctx_info + sz); 77 ctx_len += sz; 78 } 79 and similar ones while trying to access section_length on an error dump with too small size. [ rjw: Subject tweaks ]
• CVE-2026-43201 • published on May 6, 2026 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: APEI/GHES: ARM processor Error: don't go past allocated memory If the BIOS generates a very small ARM Processor Error, or an incomplete one, the current logic will fail to deferrence err-section_length and ctx_info->size Add checks to avoid that. With such changes, such GHESv2 records won't cause OOPSes like this: [ 1.492129] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000005 [#1] SMP [ 1.495449] Modules linked in: [ 1.495820] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 6.18.0-rc1-00017-gabadcc3553dd-dirty #18 PREEMPT [ 1.496125] Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 02/02/2022 [ 1.496433] Workqueue: kacpi_notify acpi_os_execute_deferred [ 1.496967] pstate: 814000c5 (Nzcv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 1.497199] pc : log_arm_hw_error+0x5c/0x200 [ 1.497380] lr : ghes_handle_arm_hw_error+0x94/0x220 0xffff8000811c5324 is in log_arm_hw_error (../drivers/ras/ras.c:75). 70 err_info = (struct cper_arm_err_info *)(err + 1); 71 ctx_info = (struct cper_arm_ctx_info *)(err_info + err->err_info_num); 72 ctx_err = (u8 *)ctx_info; 73 74 for (n = 0; n err->context_info_num; n++) { 75 sz = sizeof(struct cper_arm_ctx_info) + ctx_info->size; 76 ctx_info = (struct cper_arm_ctx_info *)((long)ctx_info + sz); 77 ctx_len += sz; 78 } 79 and similar ones while trying to access section_length on an error dump with too small size. [ rjw: Subject tweaks ]
• CVE-2026-43201 • published on May 6, 2026 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: APEI/GHES: ARM processor Error: don't go past allocated memory If the BIOS generates a very small ARM Processor Error, or an incomplete one, the current logic will fail to deferrence err-section_length and ctx_info->size Add checks to avoid that. With such changes, such GHESv2 records won't cause OOPSes like this: [ 1.492129] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000005 [#1] SMP [ 1.495449] Modules linked in: [ 1.495820] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 6.18.0-rc1-00017-gabadcc3553dd-dirty #18 PREEMPT [ 1.496125] Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 02/02/2022 [ 1.496433] Workqueue: kacpi_notify acpi_os_execute_deferred [ 1.496967] pstate: 814000c5 (Nzcv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 1.497199] pc : log_arm_hw_error+0x5c/0x200 [ 1.497380] lr : ghes_handle_arm_hw_error+0x94/0x220 0xffff8000811c5324 is in log_arm_hw_error (../drivers/ras/ras.c:75). 70 err_info = (struct cper_arm_err_info *)(err + 1); 71 ctx_info = (struct cper_arm_ctx_info *)(err_info + err->err_info_num); 72 ctx_err = (u8 *)ctx_info; 73 74 for (n = 0; n err->context_info_num; n++) { 75 sz = sizeof(struct cper_arm_ctx_info) + ctx_info->size; 76 ctx_info = (struct cper_arm_ctx_info *)((long)ctx_info + sz); 77 ctx_len += sz; 78 } 79 and similar ones while trying to access section_length on an error dump with too small size. [ rjw: Subject tweaks ]
• CVE-2026-43200 • published on May 6, 2026 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: PCI: endpoint: Fix swapped parameters in pci_{primary/secondary}_epc_epf_unlink() functions struct configfs_item_operations callbacks are defined like the following: int (*allow_link)(struct config_item *src, struct config_item *target); void (*drop_link)(struct config_item *src, struct config_item *target); While pci_primary_epc_epf_link() and pci_secondary_epc_epf_link() specify the parameters in the correct order, pci_primary_epc_epf_unlink() and pci_secondary_epc_epf_unlink() specify the parameters in the wrong order, leading to the below kernel crash when using the unlink command in configfs: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000300000857 Mem abort info: ... pc : string+0x54/0x14c lr : vsnprintf+0x280/0x6e8 ... string+0x54/0x14c vsnprintf+0x280/0x6e8 vprintk_default+0x38/0x4c vprintk+0xc4/0xe0 pci_epf_unbind+0xdc/0x108 configfs_unlink+0xe0/0x208+0x44/0x74 vfs_unlink+0x120/0x29c __arm64_sys_unlinkat+0x3c/0x90 invoke_syscall+0x48/0x134 do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x30prop.0+0xd0/0xf0 [mani: cced stable, changed commit message as per https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/aV9joi3jF1R6ca02@ryzen]
• CVE-2026-43200 • published on May 6, 2026 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: PCI: endpoint: Fix swapped parameters in pci_{primary/secondary}_epc_epf_unlink() functions struct configfs_item_operations callbacks are defined like the following: int (*allow_link)(struct config_item *src, struct config_item *target); void (*drop_link)(struct config_item *src, struct config_item *target); While pci_primary_epc_epf_link() and pci_secondary_epc_epf_link() specify the parameters in the correct order, pci_primary_epc_epf_unlink() and pci_secondary_epc_epf_unlink() specify the parameters in the wrong order, leading to the below kernel crash when using the unlink command in configfs: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000300000857 Mem abort info: ... pc : string+0x54/0x14c lr : vsnprintf+0x280/0x6e8 ... string+0x54/0x14c vsnprintf+0x280/0x6e8 vprintk_default+0x38/0x4c vprintk+0xc4/0xe0 pci_epf_unbind+0xdc/0x108 configfs_unlink+0xe0/0x208+0x44/0x74 vfs_unlink+0x120/0x29c __arm64_sys_unlinkat+0x3c/0x90 invoke_syscall+0x48/0x134 do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x30prop.0+0xd0/0xf0 [mani: cced stable, changed commit message as per https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/aV9joi3jF1R6ca02@ryzen]
• CVE-2026-43200 • published on May 6, 2026 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: PCI: endpoint: Fix swapped parameters in pci_{primary/secondary}_epc_epf_unlink() functions struct configfs_item_operations callbacks are defined like the following: int (*allow_link)(struct config_item *src, struct config_item *target); void (*drop_link)(struct config_item *src, struct config_item *target); While pci_primary_epc_epf_link() and pci_secondary_epc_epf_link() specify the parameters in the correct order, pci_primary_epc_epf_unlink() and pci_secondary_epc_epf_unlink() specify the parameters in the wrong order, leading to the below kernel crash when using the unlink command in configfs: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000300000857 Mem abort info: ... pc : string+0x54/0x14c lr : vsnprintf+0x280/0x6e8 ... string+0x54/0x14c vsnprintf+0x280/0x6e8 vprintk_default+0x38/0x4c vprintk+0xc4/0xe0 pci_epf_unbind+0xdc/0x108 configfs_unlink+0xe0/0x208+0x44/0x74 vfs_unlink+0x120/0x29c __arm64_sys_unlinkat+0x3c/0x90 invoke_syscall+0x48/0x134 do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x30prop.0+0xd0/0xf0 [mani: cced stable, changed commit message as per https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/aV9joi3jF1R6ca02@ryzen]
• CVE-2026-43200 • published on May 6, 2026 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: PCI: endpoint: Fix swapped parameters in pci_{primary/secondary}_epc_epf_unlink() functions struct configfs_item_operations callbacks are defined like the following: int (*allow_link)(struct config_item *src, struct config_item *target); void (*drop_link)(struct config_item *src, struct config_item *target); While pci_primary_epc_epf_link() and pci_secondary_epc_epf_link() specify the parameters in the correct order, pci_primary_epc_epf_unlink() and pci_secondary_epc_epf_unlink() specify the parameters in the wrong order, leading to the below kernel crash when using the unlink command in configfs: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000300000857 Mem abort info: ... pc : string+0x54/0x14c lr : vsnprintf+0x280/0x6e8 ... string+0x54/0x14c vsnprintf+0x280/0x6e8 vprintk_default+0x38/0x4c vprintk+0xc4/0xe0 pci_epf_unbind+0xdc/0x108 configfs_unlink+0xe0/0x208+0x44/0x74 vfs_unlink+0x120/0x29c __arm64_sys_unlinkat+0x3c/0x90 invoke_syscall+0x48/0x134 do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x30prop.0+0xd0/0xf0 [mani: cced stable, changed commit message as per https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/aV9joi3jF1R6ca02@ryzen]
• CVE-2026-43200 • published on May 6, 2026 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: PCI: endpoint: Fix swapped parameters in pci_{primary/secondary}_epc_epf_unlink() functions struct configfs_item_operations callbacks are defined like the following: int (*allow_link)(struct config_item *src, struct config_item *target); void (*drop_link)(struct config_item *src, struct config_item *target); While pci_primary_epc_epf_link() and pci_secondary_epc_epf_link() specify the parameters in the correct order, pci_primary_epc_epf_unlink() and pci_secondary_epc_epf_unlink() specify the parameters in the wrong order, leading to the below kernel crash when using the unlink command in configfs: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000300000857 Mem abort info: ... pc : string+0x54/0x14c lr : vsnprintf+0x280/0x6e8 ... string+0x54/0x14c vsnprintf+0x280/0x6e8 vprintk_default+0x38/0x4c vprintk+0xc4/0xe0 pci_epf_unbind+0xdc/0x108 configfs_unlink+0xe0/0x208+0x44/0x74 vfs_unlink+0x120/0x29c __arm64_sys_unlinkat+0x3c/0x90 invoke_syscall+0x48/0x134 do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x30prop.0+0xd0/0xf0 [mani: cced stable, changed commit message as per https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/aV9joi3jF1R6ca02@ryzen]
• CVE-2026-43200 • published on May 6, 2026 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: PCI: endpoint: Fix swapped parameters in pci_{primary/secondary}_epc_epf_unlink() functions struct configfs_item_operations callbacks are defined like the following: int (*allow_link)(struct config_item *src, struct config_item *target); void (*drop_link)(struct config_item *src, struct config_item *target); While pci_primary_epc_epf_link() and pci_secondary_epc_epf_link() specify the parameters in the correct order, pci_primary_epc_epf_unlink() and pci_secondary_epc_epf_unlink() specify the parameters in the wrong order, leading to the below kernel crash when using the unlink command in configfs: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000300000857 Mem abort info: ... pc : string+0x54/0x14c lr : vsnprintf+0x280/0x6e8 ... string+0x54/0x14c vsnprintf+0x280/0x6e8 vprintk_default+0x38/0x4c vprintk+0xc4/0xe0 pci_epf_unbind+0xdc/0x108 configfs_unlink+0xe0/0x208+0x44/0x74 vfs_unlink+0x120/0x29c __arm64_sys_unlinkat+0x3c/0x90 invoke_syscall+0x48/0x134 do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x30prop.0+0xd0/0xf0 [mani: cced stable, changed commit message as per https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/aV9joi3jF1R6ca02@ryzen]
• CVE-2026-43200 • published on May 6, 2026 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: PCI: endpoint: Fix swapped parameters in pci_{primary/secondary}_epc_epf_unlink() functions struct configfs_item_operations callbacks are defined like the following: int (*allow_link)(struct config_item *src, struct config_item *target); void (*drop_link)(struct config_item *src, struct config_item *target); While pci_primary_epc_epf_link() and pci_secondary_epc_epf_link() specify the parameters in the correct order, pci_primary_epc_epf_unlink() and pci_secondary_epc_epf_unlink() specify the parameters in the wrong order, leading to the below kernel crash when using the unlink command in configfs: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000300000857 Mem abort info: ... pc : string+0x54/0x14c lr : vsnprintf+0x280/0x6e8 ... string+0x54/0x14c vsnprintf+0x280/0x6e8 vprintk_default+0x38/0x4c vprintk+0xc4/0xe0 pci_epf_unbind+0xdc/0x108 configfs_unlink+0xe0/0x208+0x44/0x74 vfs_unlink+0x120/0x29c __arm64_sys_unlinkat+0x3c/0x90 invoke_syscall+0x48/0x134 do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x30prop.0+0xd0/0xf0 [mani: cced stable, changed commit message as per https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/aV9joi3jF1R6ca02@ryzen]
• CVE-2026-43200 • published on May 6, 2026 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: PCI: endpoint: Fix swapped parameters in pci_{primary/secondary}_epc_epf_unlink() functions struct configfs_item_operations callbacks are defined like the following: int (*allow_link)(struct config_item *src, struct config_item *target); void (*drop_link)(struct config_item *src, struct config_item *target); While pci_primary_epc_epf_link() and pci_secondary_epc_epf_link() specify the parameters in the correct order, pci_primary_epc_epf_unlink() and pci_secondary_epc_epf_unlink() specify the parameters in the wrong order, leading to the below kernel crash when using the unlink command in configfs: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000300000857 Mem abort info: ... pc : string+0x54/0x14c lr : vsnprintf+0x280/0x6e8 ... string+0x54/0x14c vsnprintf+0x280/0x6e8 vprintk_default+0x38/0x4c vprintk+0xc4/0xe0 pci_epf_unbind+0xdc/0x108 configfs_unlink+0xe0/0x208+0x44/0x74 vfs_unlink+0x120/0x29c __arm64_sys_unlinkat+0x3c/0x90 invoke_syscall+0x48/0x134 do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x30prop.0+0xd0/0xf0 [mani: cced stable, changed commit message as per https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/aV9joi3jF1R6ca02@ryzen]
• CVE-2026-43200 • published on May 6, 2026 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: PCI: endpoint: Fix swapped parameters in pci_{primary/secondary}_epc_epf_unlink() functions struct configfs_item_operations callbacks are defined like the following: int (*allow_link)(struct config_item *src, struct config_item *target); void (*drop_link)(struct config_item *src, struct config_item *target); While pci_primary_epc_epf_link() and pci_secondary_epc_epf_link() specify the parameters in the correct order, pci_primary_epc_epf_unlink() and pci_secondary_epc_epf_unlink() specify the parameters in the wrong order, leading to the below kernel crash when using the unlink command in configfs: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000300000857 Mem abort info: ... pc : string+0x54/0x14c lr : vsnprintf+0x280/0x6e8 ... string+0x54/0x14c vsnprintf+0x280/0x6e8 vprintk_default+0x38/0x4c vprintk+0xc4/0xe0 pci_epf_unbind+0xdc/0x108 configfs_unlink+0xe0/0x208+0x44/0x74 vfs_unlink+0x120/0x29c __arm64_sys_unlinkat+0x3c/0x90 invoke_syscall+0x48/0x134 do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x30prop.0+0xd0/0xf0 [mani: cced stable, changed commit message as per https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/aV9joi3jF1R6ca02@ryzen]
• CVE-2026-43200 • published on May 6, 2026 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: PCI: endpoint: Fix swapped parameters in pci_{primary/secondary}_epc_epf_unlink() functions struct configfs_item_operations callbacks are defined like the following: int (*allow_link)(struct config_item *src, struct config_item *target); void (*drop_link)(struct config_item *src, struct config_item *target); While pci_primary_epc_epf_link() and pci_secondary_epc_epf_link() specify the parameters in the correct order, pci_primary_epc_epf_unlink() and pci_secondary_epc_epf_unlink() specify the parameters in the wrong order, leading to the below kernel crash when using the unlink command in configfs: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000300000857 Mem abort info: ... pc : string+0x54/0x14c lr : vsnprintf+0x280/0x6e8 ... string+0x54/0x14c vsnprintf+0x280/0x6e8 vprintk_default+0x38/0x4c vprintk+0xc4/0xe0 pci_epf_unbind+0xdc/0x108 configfs_unlink+0xe0/0x208+0x44/0x74 vfs_unlink+0x120/0x29c __arm64_sys_unlinkat+0x3c/0x90 invoke_syscall+0x48/0x134 do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x30prop.0+0xd0/0xf0 [mani: cced stable, changed commit message as per https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/aV9joi3jF1R6ca02@ryzen]
• CVE-2026-43200 • published on May 6, 2026 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: PCI: endpoint: Fix swapped parameters in pci_{primary/secondary}_epc_epf_unlink() functions struct configfs_item_operations callbacks are defined like the following: int (*allow_link)(struct config_item *src, struct config_item *target); void (*drop_link)(struct config_item *src, struct config_item *target); While pci_primary_epc_epf_link() and pci_secondary_epc_epf_link() specify the parameters in the correct order, pci_primary_epc_epf_unlink() and pci_secondary_epc_epf_unlink() specify the parameters in the wrong order, leading to the below kernel crash when using the unlink command in configfs: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000300000857 Mem abort info: ... pc : string+0x54/0x14c lr : vsnprintf+0x280/0x6e8 ... string+0x54/0x14c vsnprintf+0x280/0x6e8 vprintk_default+0x38/0x4c vprintk+0xc4/0xe0 pci_epf_unbind+0xdc/0x108 configfs_unlink+0xe0/0x208+0x44/0x74 vfs_unlink+0x120/0x29c __arm64_sys_unlinkat+0x3c/0x90 invoke_syscall+0x48/0x134 do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x30prop.0+0xd0/0xf0 [mani: cced stable, changed commit message as per https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/aV9joi3jF1R6ca02@ryzen]
• CVE-2026-43200 • published on May 6, 2026 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: PCI: endpoint: Fix swapped parameters in pci_{primary/secondary}_epc_epf_unlink() functions struct configfs_item_operations callbacks are defined like the following: int (*allow_link)(struct config_item *src, struct config_item *target); void (*drop_link)(struct config_item *src, struct config_item *target); While pci_primary_epc_epf_link() and pci_secondary_epc_epf_link() specify the parameters in the correct order, pci_primary_epc_epf_unlink() and pci_secondary_epc_epf_unlink() specify the parameters in the wrong order, leading to the below kernel crash when using the unlink command in configfs: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000300000857 Mem abort info: ... pc : string+0x54/0x14c lr : vsnprintf+0x280/0x6e8 ... string+0x54/0x14c vsnprintf+0x280/0x6e8 vprintk_default+0x38/0x4c vprintk+0xc4/0xe0 pci_epf_unbind+0xdc/0x108 configfs_unlink+0xe0/0x208+0x44/0x74 vfs_unlink+0x120/0x29c __arm64_sys_unlinkat+0x3c/0x90 invoke_syscall+0x48/0x134 do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x30prop.0+0xd0/0xf0 [mani: cced stable, changed commit message as per https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/aV9joi3jF1R6ca02@ryzen]